Asus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 01:33
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 81
1-Core 131
2-Core 251
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 803
77% 636 Pts
64-Core 1,095
68% 1,095 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
MSI(1462 3861) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 152
Parallax 105
92% 123 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 102
Splatting 79.5
78% 98 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 87%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 224 345 361 366 212 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 403
Write 394
Mixed 329
SusWrite 295
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 27.8
100% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 241
207% 306 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 115%
WDBRPG0010BNC-WRSN 1TB
292GB free
Firmware: 111110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1382 755 984 1120 1132 1158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1498
Write 1,529
Mixed 1,500
SusWrite 1,089
316% 1,404 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 38.8
125% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 557
DQ Write 653
DQ Mixed 710
506% 640 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 192%
Great: 349%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
851GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 133 139 139 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 81.6
Write 67.9
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 136
64% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
548GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 198 199 202 201 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 150
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 198
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
78% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 163 164 163 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 133
Write 149
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 161
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 72 77 77 76 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 117
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 74.4
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.8
244% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-16GTZNC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 35.2
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 26.5
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 27" 1280 720 MSI3CB5 MSI G271
Typical PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 3,364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B550M-A (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $558
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback