Acer Aspire A315-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A315-41  (all builds)
MotherboardRR Metapod_RR
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 22:54
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 115
46% 78.1 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 280
30% 241 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Acer(1025 1259) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
9.43% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 16.3
9% 13.2 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 13.1
Splatting 11.4
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.43%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 166 147 112 84 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 405
Write 260
Mixed 195
SusWrite 136
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 16.5
64% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 168
135% 189 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P24HC4N2-BWCS 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
70.5% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 24.5
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 19.4
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0675
Typical Aspire A315-41 Builds (Compare 459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback