Samsung 960XFH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive392% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSamsung 960XFH  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP960XFH-XA1US
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 21:38
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 73.5
1-Core 171
2-Core 320
100% 188 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 1,014
97% 802 Pts
64-Core 1,501
93% 1,501 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1CC) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 29.8
20% 28.6 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 32.9
Splatting 23.7
23% 28.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B 1TB
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7FK2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2216 2112 2079 2124 2124 2129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
392% Outstanding
Read 2,815
Write 3,157
Mixed 2,744
SusWrite 2,131
612% 2,712 MB/s
4K Read 78.3
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 105
334% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,158
DQ Write 844
DQ Mixed 991
743% 998 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 392%
Great: 447%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
164% Outstanding
MC Read 63.9
MC Write 67.6
MC Mixed 61.6
184% 64.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 51.1
SC Mixed 28.1
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 164%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 49 60 16" 1280 720 SDC4185
Typical 960XFH Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Samsung 960XFH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback