Asus G751JY

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G751JY  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G751JY
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190611
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 21:17
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4750HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 150
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 412
42% 343 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M
Asus(1043 22DA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.8% Average
Lighting 48.7
Reflection 79.9
Parallax 50.4
40% 59.7 fps
MRender 58.3
Gravity 53.8
Splatting 47.5
43% 53.2 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 561 151 151 151 153 151 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 128%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223
24GB free
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,150
Write 1,100
Mixed 628
213% 959 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 42.6
142% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 344
257% 342 MB/s
Poor: 109% Great: 220%
Asmt ASM105x 1TB
479GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 121 120 120 122 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 122
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 19.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 18.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 75 17.3" 1280 720 LGD046C
Typical G751JY Builds (Compare 584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Asus G751JY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback