Asus X550CC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X550CC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550CC
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 18:04
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2117U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 57.8
35% 52.3 Pts
4-Core 64.2
8-Core 61.6
8% 62.9 Pts
64-Core 60.9
4% 60.9 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720M
Asus(1043 124D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8857
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4
Parallax 1.4
3% 3.17 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12573
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 311 274 299 373 389 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 247
Write 269
Mixed 265
SusWrite 319
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 17.3
61% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 95.9
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 115
82% 104 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0 Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.8
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 52 60 15.5" 1280 720 SEC334A
Typical X550CC Builds (Compare 930 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550CC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback