Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M 9 User benchmarks, average bench 53% , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Memory 80.4 1-Core 70.6 2-Core 107 55% 85.9 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 167 22% 166 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 397D) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 1.5 2% 1.87 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 2%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 256G 256GB 2,993 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: 020fAA20 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 249 Write 264 Mixed 59.5 42% 191 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 23.6 4K Mixed 12.1 49% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 14.6 DQ Write 34.6 DQ Mixed 14.2 14% 21.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 103%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 26GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 27.5 Write 5.3 Mixed 10.3 14% 14.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 2.7 140% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	55	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO21EC

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16