Lenovo 80SV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80SV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Torronto 5C1
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161110
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 04 '18 at 22:38
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 72
2-Core 175
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 200
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Legend(17AA 39F1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8871
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 8.65
Parallax 8.22
6% 7.92 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 7.74
6% 7.22 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000L2 256GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV02L0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 465
Mixed 498
109% 487 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 32.3
104% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 137
148% 248 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3AZ Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 18.9
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80SV Builds (Compare 973 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80SV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback