Acer Nitro AN515-46

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-46  (all builds)
MotherboardRB Jimny_RBH
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221207
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 11:37
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 142
52% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 513
47% 395 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 159E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.11.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (51 fps cap detected)
35.7% Below average
Lighting 45.3
Reflection 50.2
Parallax 51.1
37% 48.9 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 51.3
Splatting 50.4
33% 38.6 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BT7 512GB
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7402Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1762 1562 947 961 965 963 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,921
Write 1,746
Mixed 1,905
SusWrite 1,193
380% 1,691 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 51.6
164% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 584
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 524
373% 482 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 221%
Great: 425%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
69.9% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 22.6
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 19.1
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 165 15.5" 1536 864 BOE0ABF
Typical Nitro AN515-46 Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Acer Nitro AN515-46

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback