Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (0th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 100 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot Drive	14.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 80FA
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '23 at 09:39
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6600U 31,982 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 9.3 2-Core 26.5 8% 17.9 Pts	4-Core 64.7 8-Core 85.7 10% 75.2 Pts	64-Core 90.7 6% 90.7 Pts
Poor: 18% Great: 58%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV512TBN-1AR1ZABHA 512GB 910 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 449GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPC0012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 127 127 106 93 99 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.6% Very poor	Read 74.6 Write 78.2 Mixed 72.9 SusWrite 137 20% 90.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 2.6 11% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G1A1 2x8GB 258 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 11.3 34% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 444 9% 444 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 72%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	0	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	598x

SSD
SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 70%, 12,432 samples	60x
MZNLN256HMHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 91%, 5,596 samples	46x
MTFDDAV256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GBCrucialBench 71%, 3,094 samples	26x

RAM
M471A5244BB0-CPB 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,688 samples	253x
4ATF51264HZ-2G1A1 2x4GBMicronBench 60%, 248 samples	86x
MT40A512M16JY-083E:B 2x4GBMicronBench 60%, 125 samples	74x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16