Dell PowerEdge R650xs

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemDell PowerEdge R650xs
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R650xs  (all builds)
Memory246 GB free of 256 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 06:23
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6338N
CPU1, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 45.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 202
61% 117 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 816
72% 613 Pts
64-Core 4,047
250% 4,047 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dellboss VD 240GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 256 243 243 248 243 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 348
Write 256
Mixed 280
SusWrite 248
64% 283 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 21.7
4K Mixed 21.8
76% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 181
134% 180 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 78%
Dell PERC H755 Front 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 5.16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 820 641 632 653 642 651 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
295GB free
Firmware: 2501
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 96 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 123
Write 116
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 94.1
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.2
112% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA82GR7DJR8N-XN 00AD00B300AD HMA82GR7DJR8N-XN 00AD069D00AD HMA82GR7DJR8N-XN 00AD069D00AD HMA82GR7DJR8N-XN 00AD069D00AD HMA82GR7DJR8N-XN 00AD00B300AD HMA82GR7DJR8N-XN 00AD069D00AD HMA82GR7DJR8N-XN 00AD00B300AD HMA82GR7DJR8N-XN... 256GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
257% Outstanding
MC Read 100
MC Write 125
MC Mixed 104
313% 110 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 11
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 234%
This bench: 257%
Great: 254%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 17 14 60 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback