Asus PRIME B350-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 20:50
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 71.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 219
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 720
72% 586 Pts
64-Core 1,193
74% 1,193 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.7% Poor
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 40.2
Parallax 37.5
29% 37.9 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 27.1
27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,896
Write 1,113
Mixed 360
245% 1,123 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 39.6
151% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 721
DQ Write 475
DQ Mixed 619
456% 605 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 1TB
345GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 320 324 321 332 326 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 425
Write 456
Mixed 336
SusWrite 324
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 32.7
107% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 165
144% 207 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 95%
Samsung PSSD T7 2TB
586GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 569 568 572 572 577 577 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 100%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
545GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 324 320 322 323 333 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 257
Write 247
Mixed 109
SusWrite 326
171% 235 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.2
292% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 167%
Great: 212%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1.5TB
271GB free, PID 5031
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 76.3
Write 77.5
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 69.4
82% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 33%
WD My Book 1235 4TB
485GB free, PID 1235
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 132 132 132 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 132
Write 135
Mixed 100
SusWrite 132
169% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.6% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 26.3
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23.4
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM7706 LG HDR 4K
Typical PRIME B350-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS - $92

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $440
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback