HP EliteBook 8470p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8470p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 179B
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 20:43
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3940XM-$344
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
68% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 181
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 434
48% 377 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 179B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.79% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 3.2
4% 3.37 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5.4
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC400 512GB-$180
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 419 395 113 442 210 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 482
Write 454
Mixed 314
SusWrite 330
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 27.5
95% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 67.6
121% 238 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-186.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.6% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 24 40 14" 1280 720 SDC4642
Typical EliteBook 8470p Builds (Compare 1,414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8470p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback