Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 201%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 190%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-PRO  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 19:20
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$168
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 170
2-Core 330
107% 198 Pts
4-Core 645
8-Core 1,012
102% 828 Pts
64-Core 1,394
86% 1,394 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 283
Reflection 256
Parallax 289
231% 276 fps
MRender 322
Gravity 232
Splatting 174
191% 243 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 194%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct250mx5 0 250GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 429 408 399 405 399 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 421
Write 410
Mixed 372
SusWrite 410
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 41.5
133% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 247
199% 279 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 121%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
46GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 264 220 242 234 218 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
78% Very good
Read 338
Write 386
Mixed 338
SusWrite 243
74% 326 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 30.5
116% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 326
242% 321 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78%
Great: 99%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
143GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 447 218 141 153 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 441
Write 378
Mixed 390
SusWrite 257
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 35.3
110% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 303
223% 288 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 95%
Crucial BX300 240GB-$43
222GB free
Firmware: M2CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 435 393 397 401 398 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 395
Write 367
Mixed 331
SusWrite 409
85% 376 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 42.4
149% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 294
232% 320 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 203 199 207 209 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 151
Mixed 78.4
SusWrite 203
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 33.2
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 31.1
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 37.4
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 28 217 60 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ7955 BenQ EW2780Q
Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $647
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback