Performance Results


Gaming 121% UFO	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 119% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core 74 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 60.9 1-Core 105 2-Core 232 70% 133 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 927 83% 699 Pts	64-Core 859 53% 859 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT 3,615 User benchmarks, average bench 180% Gigabyte(1458 2413) ≥ 4GB Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.12.1 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	161% Outstanding	Lighting 183 Reflection 198 Parallax 468 149% 283 fps	MRender 319 Gravity 278 Splatting 251 228% 283 fps
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Truenas iSCSI Disk 2TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2TB free Firmware: 380 SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 383 394 420 431 426 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 422 Write 453 Mixed 450 SusWrite 403 98% 432 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 10.4 4K Mixed 10.1 34% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 63.2 DQ Write 72.9 DQ Mixed 65.1 50% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 74%
Qemu HARDDISK 387GB 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 2,088 Write 1,351 Mixed 1,718 1,296% 1,719 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 42.8 7,353% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 343 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 303 2,790% 306 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 2x16GB 1,370 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM RAM Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	173% Outstanding	MC Read 64.3 MC Write 77 MC Mixed 71.1 202% 70.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 31 68% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 173% Great: 231%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	23	3	120	48.8"	1280 720	SAM0F9C C49RG9x

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16