Acer Nitro AN515-57

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-57  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Scala_TLS
Memory18.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 19:04
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 25.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 232
63% 127 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 472
45% 374 Pts
64-Core 710
44% 710 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 500 687 530 535 532 793 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 598
Write 634
Mixed 577
SusWrite 596
136% 601 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 21.3
70% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 585
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 445
338% 461 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 103%
Great: 242%
Nvme KINGSTON SNV2S500G 500GB
197GB free
Firmware: SBI02102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 207 163 164 167 240 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 891
Write 208
Mixed 275
SusWrite 183
85% 389 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 9.9
63% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 646
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 228
238% 400 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 342%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 24GB
2667, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 11.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 4.4
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 238
17% 238 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 8% 13 13 4 64 0" 1920 1009
Typical Nitro AN515-57 Builds (Compare 15,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-57

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback