Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago.

System	Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP355E7C-A01US
Memory	0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130704
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '23 at 13:11
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-4300M APU-$88 2,270 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Memory 42 1-Core 27.5 2-Core 24.9 23% 31.5 Pts	4-Core 22 8-Core 23.1 3% 22.5 Pts	64-Core 25.3 2% 25.3 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7420G 1,918 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C0DD) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	1% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 0.7 1% 1.3 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 1TB 9,059 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 826GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 182 233 197 203 212 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.8% Poor	Read 150 Write 94.5 Mixed 85.1 SusWrite 204 30% 134 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 10.3 4K Mixed 4.5 23% 7.6 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 53.4 DQ Mixed 75.1 56% 76.5 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773EB0-CK0 M471B5773EB0-CK0 4GB 257 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 800, 800 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 4.9 12% 4.27 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 0.8 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	50	27	60	17.2"	1280 720	AUO149E

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

CPU
A8-4500M APUAMDBench 39%, 9,726 samples	18x
A6-4400M APUAMDBench 35%, 6,363 samples	10x
A10-4600M APUAMDBench 43%, 5,886 samples	9x

GPU
Radeon HD 7640GAMDBench 3%, 7,719 samples	18x
Radeon HD 7520GAMDBench 2%, 4,996 samples	10x
Radeon HD 7660GAMDBench 4%, 4,227 samples	9x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	4x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 28%, 329 samples	8x
CT102464BF186D.M16 CT8G3S186DM.C16FN 16GBUnknownBench 33%, 7 samples	4x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 31%, 243 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16