Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive352% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory56 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 10:12
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 64.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 233
75% 138 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 915
81% 686 Pts
64-Core 2,298
142% 2,298 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 189
Parallax 181
138% 180 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 185
Splatting 125
119% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
569GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1714 2405 2382 2422 2429 2415 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 2,518
Write 2,500
Mixed 2,193
SusWrite 2,294
536% 2,376 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 67.1
240% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 961
DQ Write 723
DQ Mixed 856
636% 847 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 352%
Great: 623%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
60GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,544
Write 2,365
Mixed 1,950
509% 2,286 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 77.7
253% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 972
DQ Write 574
DQ Mixed 824
600% 790 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
102GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 475 475 475 476 477 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 460
Mixed 414
SusWrite 476
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 48.8
158% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
82GB free
Firmware: DXM03B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 371 474 474 475 476 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 362
Mixed 296
SusWrite 446
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 38.5
132% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 137
153% 261 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 103%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FAD 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
145% Outstanding
MC Read 58.1
MC Write 60.7
MC Mixed 55.3
166% 58 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 24.6
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 145%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 26.9" 1280 720 BNQ7F47 BenQ SW2700
Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $998
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback