Asrock N68-VGS3 UCC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68-VGS3 UCC  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 06:55
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 38.8
2-Core 51
37% 52.7 Pts
4-Core 53.5
8-Core 54
7% 53.8 Pts
64-Core 54.3
3% 54.3 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0F02) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.3% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 1.1
2% 3.1 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.3%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0309
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 90.6
Write 66.7
Mixed 77.2
17% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 11.1
36% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 40
DQ Mixed 29.6
23% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18.5
Write 5.2
Mixed 6.7
10% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.4
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 6 60 18.5" 1280 720 GSM4C09 E1942
Typical N68-VGS3 UCC Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-VGS3 UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback