Shuttle DH310

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemShuttle DH310  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle FS310
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 00:30
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 117
2-Core 212
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 648
57% 485 Pts
64-Core 685
42% 685 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1297 4062) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.9
4% 6.93 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 11.2
8% 9.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1006 512GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,548
Write 1,568
Mixed 1,178
319% 1,432 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 74.8
257% 95.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,200
DQ Write 762
DQ Mixed 946
714% 969 MB/s
Poor: 88% Great: 214%
Dahua C800 2.5 inch SATA 1TB SSD
954GB free
Firmware: V06098B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 377 377 386 385 373 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 395
Mixed 362
SusWrite 379
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 27.7
130% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 44.2
81% 157 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston LV32D4S2S8HD-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 64%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 7 165 27" 1280 720 DEL4239 DELL S2722DGM
Typical DH310 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Shuttle DH310

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback