Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics6.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive558% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 22:04
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700-$292
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 72.7
1-Core 214
2-Core 426
121% 237 Pts
4-Core 854
8-Core 1,027
122% 940 Pts
64-Core 1,027
64% 1,027 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 113%
Great: 126%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
6.72% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 11.9
8% 12.7 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.72%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IRP-SSDPR-P44S-2K0-80 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM51.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4044 4053 4079 4171 4126 1955 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
558% Outstanding
Read 2,675
Write 4,280
Mixed 3,326
SusWrite 3738
796% 3505 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 340
4K Mixed 124
438% 176 MB/s
DQ Read 2187
DQ Write 1,746
DQ Mixed 1,903
1,442% 1,945 MB/s
Poor: 224%
This bench: 558%
Great: 585%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3636F162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
153% Outstanding
MC Read 63.6
MC Write 57.7
MC Mixed 56.8
170% 59.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 49.5
SC Mixed 30.2
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 153%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 54 60 23.2" 1280 720 SAM0303 SyncMaster
Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS Builds (Compare 818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 265%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 292%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,095
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback