Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 312%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 382%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics340% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive342% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 17:12
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 72.5
1-Core 163
2-Core 326
98% 187 Pts
4-Core 638
8-Core 1,257
112% 947 Pts
64-Core 2,539
157% 2,539 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,750
Nvidia(10DE 167C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
340% Outstanding
Lighting 554
Reflection 575
Parallax 735
452% 622 fps
MRender 434
Gravity 465
Splatting 245
298% 381 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 340%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
523GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2413 1813 1893 1829 1880 1892 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 2,190
Write 2848
Mixed 2,451
SusWrite 1,953
534% 2,361 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 92.7
281% 96.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,216
DQ Write 863
DQ Mixed 1032
773% 1,037 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 342%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C14 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 24.6
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 22.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 240 48.7" 1280 720 SAM7454 Odyssey G93SC
Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,725
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback