HP EliteBook 8470p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 8470p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 179B
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130131
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 17:10
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 110
47% 77.8 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 170
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 179B) 1,020MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.73% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 2.6
3% 2.43 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.73%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
455GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 259 248 246 234 231 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 379
Write 333
Mixed 323
SusWrite 258
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 25.2
84% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 144
107% 143 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$224
265GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 261 332 341 367 370 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 390
Write 369
Mixed 302
SusWrite 333
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 22.2
76% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 158
118% 158 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 4.2
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 34 18 40 14" 1280 720 AUO223E
Typical EliteBook 8470p Builds (Compare 1,414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8470p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback