Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 GAMING X
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 15:54
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 101
2-Core 202
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 715
67% 559 Pts
64-Core 1,000
62% 1,000 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.4% Very good
Lighting 88.7
Reflection 98.7
Parallax 92.2
72% 93.2 fps
MRender 87.6
Gravity 88.1
Splatting 90.2
73% 88.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
742GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7601Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,078
Write 1,899
Mixed 1,919
439% 1,965 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 63.7
203% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 609
DQ Write 475
DQ Mixed 534
402% 539 MB/s
Poor: 192% Great: 444%
Hitachi HUS722T2TALA600 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: RADEMU03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 182
Write 225
Mixed 109
127% 172 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
389% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3600 C17 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 33.3
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 24.5
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 102%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM7707 LG HDR 4K
Typical GA-Z390 GAMING X-CF Builds (Compare 12,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X - $225

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $806
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback