Asrock Z270 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z270 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20180321
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '23 at 11:55
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$88 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 102 2-Core 204 73% 129 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 369 50% 372 Pts	64-Core 366 23% 366 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 86DC) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.77 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Lighting 18.3 Reflection 18.6 Parallax 18.8 15% 18.6 fps	MRender 15.8 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 17.2 14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
JMicron 128GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0601 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 34 59 60 47 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 288 Write 56.8 Mixed 118 SusWrite 54.4 28% 129 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 19.6 4K Mixed 14.4 52% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 63.3 DQ Write 13.9 DQ Mixed 0 10% 25.7 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 71%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 112GB free Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 534 200 192 184 179 175 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	162% Outstanding	Read 1,613 Write 1,370 Mixed 585 SusWrite 244 211% 953 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 77.6 4K Mixed 42.4 150% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 999 DQ Write 631 DQ Mixed 547 480% 726 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 162% Great: 236%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FHP 2x8GB 1,088 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 23.9 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 25.9 SC Mixed 19.3 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 85.1 47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	38	4	60	23"	1280 720	DELA05F DELL U2311H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Extreme4 - $170

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	632x
Core i5-7600KIntel $169Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	174x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	128x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	126x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	69x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	38x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	60x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	51x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $742

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16