Gigabyte GA-G5 KF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G5 KF  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 09:43
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 62.1
1-Core 152
2-Core 238
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 440
47% 375 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 A550) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4617
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.8% Poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 27.6
21% 26.3 fps
MRender 31.7
Gravity 27.4
Splatting 26.8
23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10 512GB
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM15.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1401 308 311 312 313 320 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,895
Write 1,940
Mixed 1694
SusWrite 494
338% 1,506 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 71.2
273% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 858
DQ Write 704
DQ Mixed 830
608% 797 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 224%
Great: 376%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 36.1
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 22.7
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 215 58 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical GA-G5 KF Builds (Compare 538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G5 KF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback