Lenovo 83FS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 83FS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230625
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 09:08
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User LAO-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 71.9
1-Core 164
2-Core 327
98% 188 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 426
69% 494 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F93) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4889
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 20.9
Parallax 21.7
8% 17.7 fps
MRender 19.3
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 16.2
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 512GB
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L1QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1210 1453 1145 1938 1797 1316 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 1,403
Write 1,548
Mixed 1,048
SusWrite 1,477
309% 1,369 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 107
332% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,545
DQ Write 1,333
DQ Mixed 1,082
908% 1,320 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 315%
Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3310MF96HAF-3200 Micron MT40A1G16TB-062E:F 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 30.2
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 24.1
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE08D5
Typical 83FS Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 83FS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback