Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
MotherboardRed RHEL-AV
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 08:42
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5320
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 43.5
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 174
54% 101 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 332
44% 331 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A16-1B
Nvidia(10DE 159D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 528.89
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.8% Below average
Lighting 43.5
Reflection 35.1
Parallax 38
36% 38.9 fps
MRender 45
Gravity 31.8
Splatting 27.8
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 86GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 106 108 110 106 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 103
Mixed 131
SusWrite 105
102% 137 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 3.9
671% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
77.3% Very good
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 30.3
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 9.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 45 60 29.7" 1280 720 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback