bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	37.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DX79TO
Memory	14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '18 at 17:01
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 100 2-Core 200 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 500 57% 444 Pts	64-Core 503 31% 503 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% MSI(1462 2775) 3GB CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	37.8% Below average	Lighting 49.5 Reflection 32.8 Parallax 60.7 40% 47.7 fps	MRender 30.8 Gravity 48 Splatting 40.9 33% 39.9 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139 17,545 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 88GB free Firmware: X2306RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 8295 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1965 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 26 (A8) Unknown 100 100 165 (A9) Unknown 100 100 336 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 84 (AE) Unknown 100 100 95 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 69 59 253403987999 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 592 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 21945 (F1) Unknown 253 253 11713 (F2) Unknown 253 253 13351 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	78.9% Very good	Read 416 Write 411 Mixed 382 90% 403 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 23.2 90% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 50.7 84% 162 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 99%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1728 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1749 (B1) Unknown 98 98 27 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 50 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 266 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10056721388	98.7% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 411 Mixed 424 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 79.7 4K Mixed 38.2 143% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 93.2 100% 167 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 124%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 14GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 138 Write 43.6 Mixed 54.7 83% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.99 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.7 75% 2.22 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 39%
General USB Flash Disk 64GB 2,253 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 7GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	5.72% Terrible	Read 17.2 Write 9.39 Mixed 9.02 14% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.96 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.01 19% 1.66 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.72% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x4D33393142353637334548312D43463820 0x2C00 0x31384A53463235363732415A2D31473144 0xCE00 0x4D33393142353637334548312D43463820 0x2C00 0x31384A53463235363732415A2D31473144 0xCE00 0x4D33393142353637334548312D43463820 0x2C00 0x31384A5346323... 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	70.7% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 25.6 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 12.4 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,034x
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,577x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	939x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,049x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	427x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	518x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	377x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $322

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16