HP 250 G8 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 250 G8 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85F3
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201221
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 15:06
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 187
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 253
32% 245 Pts
64-Core 250
16% 250 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
HP(103C 85F3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 5.1
4% 5.13 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 185 182 181 176 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 808
Write 541
Mixed 668
SusWrite 187
123% 551 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 44.2
148% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 395
DQ Write 78.4
DQ Mixed 122
119% 199 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 183%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-XN Kingston 99U5704-002.A00G 8GB
3200, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 19
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 17.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 5 60 15.5" 1366 715 CMN1535
Typical 250 G8 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 2,544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G8 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback