HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1984
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 14:17
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 35.3
2-Core 60.6
38% 54.8 Pts
4-Core 78.9
8-Core 82.5
11% 80.7 Pts
64-Core 85.1
5% 85.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
HP(103C 1984) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
3.61% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 3.9
3% 5.03 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 6.4
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.61%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S750 512GB
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0823A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 303 299 309 326 329 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 393
Write 314
Mixed 315
SusWrite 309
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 14.6
72% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 37.1
54% 103 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.1% Poor
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 7.4
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 60 17.3" 1280 720 SDC3654
Typical Pavilion 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback