Intel X79F1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X79F1  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221018
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 12:38
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 141
57% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 462
44% 361 Pts
64-Core 743
46% 743 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
XFX(1682 E580) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.21018.6011
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
44.2% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 58
Parallax 76.3
46% 63.4 fps
MRender 57.4
Gravity 54.9
Splatting 43.5
42% 51.9 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 425
Write 321
Mixed 294
77% 347 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 9.3
64% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 96.1
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 17.2
49% 102 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
453GB free
Firmware: KC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 116 117 115 116 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 84.7
Write 86.4
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 115
62% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF51272PZ- 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.5
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 38 60 21.6" 1280 720 PHLC079 Philips 227EL
Typical X79F1 Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Intel X79F1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback