HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics6.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84F7
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 08:27
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Memory 33.9
1-Core 8.4
2-Core 19.4
15% 20.6 Pts
4-Core 32.1
8-Core 40.8
5% 36.4 Pts
64-Core 41
2% 41 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
HP(103C 84F7) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1278
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.26% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 8.3
6% 7.8 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 5.7
7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 6.26%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WALRAM 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0714C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 169 63 63 66 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 462
Write 468
Mixed 350
SusWrite 105
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 8.2
31% 9.7 MB/s
DQ Read 67.3
DQ Write 58.9
DQ Mixed 74.3
53% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
703GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 94 93 94 89 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 91.4
Write 92.7
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 89
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 7.7
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 397
10% 397 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 51 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO38ED
Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 8,880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback