MSI H81M-E33 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI H81M-E33 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 08:14
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 85.4
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 102
55% 85.1 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 141
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.87 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Consistent S6 256GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0220A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 406 389 410 204 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 433
Write 397
Mixed 392
SusWrite 336
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 30.5
118% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 54.8
90% 170 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.7
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 17.2
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 70 0" 1296 1024 Default
Typical H81M-E33 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 2,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H81M-E33 (MS-7817) - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $336
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback