Asrock B550M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B550M-C  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210803
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 00:48
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 80.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 261
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 792
76% 629 Pts
64-Core 988
61% 988 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
MSI(1462 8E99) ≥ 4GB; GV-N1060G1GAMING-6GD, Gigabyte G1 Gaming
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77% Very good
Lighting 105
Reflection 85.4
Parallax 90.7
86% 93.8 fps
MRender 84.7
Gravity 72.8
Splatting 65.7
60% 74.4 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 77%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte G325E500G 500GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMG1.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,123
Write 1,501
Mixed 184
208% 936 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 63.2
126% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,043
DQ Write 623
DQ Mixed 771
591% 812 MB/s
Poor: 100% Great: 255%
Generic External 640GB
556GB free, PID 3920
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 35 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 56.8
Write 25.1
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 36.1
46% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
41% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4U0832182B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 37.5
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 35.5
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 30" 1280 720 ACR0959 XZ306C X
Typical B550M-C Builds (Compare 1,223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B550M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $501
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback