Lenovo 20LCS16X00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20LCS16X00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20LCS16X00
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '23 at 22:14
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 41
2-Core 77.4
39% 60.7 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 179
20% 156 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 71%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 105 100 93 110 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.1% Average
Read 155
Write 189
Mixed 226
SusWrite 109
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 19.5
69% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 205
152% 202 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 21.9
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 64 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback