Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515UA_D515UA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515UA_D515UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515UA
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211129
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 04 '23 at 18:46
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 71.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
85% 160 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 806
80% 652 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 82%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 165C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44.14
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 26.4
16% 20.2 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 20.1
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 877 400 194 195 194 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,327
Write 907
Mixed 925
SusWrite 343
195% 876 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 53.9
177% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 482
DQ Write 689
DQ Mixed 574
437% 582 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 155%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 16GB
3200, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
64.4% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 22.5
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 20.7
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E7
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515UA_D515UA Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515UA_D515UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback