Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory117.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211130
Uptime18.8 Days
Run DateDec 04 '23 at 13:31
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 61.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 233
73% 137 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 897
79% 671 Pts
64-Core 2252
139% 2252 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Asus(1043 8728) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 160
Parallax 160
134% 161 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 140
Splatting 122
120% 150 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFMC1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2248 359 889 114 591 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,756
Write 2,441
Mixed 2,006
SusWrite 719
390% 1,730 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 58.8
210% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 384
DQ Mixed 600
445% 600 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 206%
Great: 310%
SHGP31-1000GM-2 1TB
521GB free
Firmware: 41060C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2182 2319 1709 1424 1409 1429 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,542
Write 2,395
Mixed 1,653
SusWrite 1,745
468% 2,084 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 74.5
243% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 909
DQ Write 418
DQ Mixed 636
479% 654 MB/s
Poor: 181%
This bench: 314%
Great: 414%
SHGS31-500GS-2 500GB
218GB free
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 415 274 275 276 266 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 469
Mixed 418
SusWrite 328
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 31.8
116% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 109%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
626GB free
Firmware: 04.05G11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 74 75 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 69.4
Write 74.1
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 74.1
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 51.4
MC Write 52.9
MC Mixed 48.4
145% 50.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 22.7
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 128%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 7 60 34.1" 2560 1009 GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,079
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback