Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 189%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics234% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190802
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 04 '23 at 12:47
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 70
1-Core 140
2-Core 270
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 906
87% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,426
88% 1,426 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$767
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
234% Outstanding
Lighting 339
Reflection 326
Parallax 344
276% 336 fps
MRender 461
Gravity 294
Splatting 211
250% 322 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 234%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,587
Write 1,740
Mixed 1,041
325% 1,456 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 70.4
238% 91.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,270
DQ Write 910
DQ Mixed 1035
788% 1,072 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 284%
WD Blue SA510 2.5 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 530309WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 368 376 394 382 388 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 331
Mixed 395
SusWrite 378
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 50
160% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 112
108% 170 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 102%
Great: 123%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
2TB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 420 425 445 443 449 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 346
Mixed 328
SusWrite 433
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 37.9
137% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 184
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.8% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 25.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 24" 1920 1080 ACR062C Acer XFA240
Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $822
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback