Gigabyte GA-H81M-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-HD3  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140513
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateDec 04 '23 at 10:45
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 523
52% 426 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 15.9
14% 16.6 fps
MRender 21.6
Gravity 18
Splatting 14.8
14% 18.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 231 233 240 242 240 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
78.9% Very good
Read 259
Write 243
Mixed 236
SusWrite 228
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 45.1
148% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 177
136% 183 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
65GB free
Firmware: 3.CHF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 45 44 46 46 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 106
Write 15.2
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 44.6
36% 49.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 42%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$190
246GB free
Firmware: MN6OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 119 116 119 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 56.7
Write 78.4
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 117
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$27
565GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 59 69 62 66 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63% Good
Read 154
Write 90.5
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 65.5
61% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 0215 CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ78D5 BenQ GL2760
Typical GA-H81M-HD3 Builds (Compare 943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-HD3 - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback