Samsung 550XDA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 3.78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics4.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 550XDA  (all builds)
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230411
Uptime5 Days
Run DateDec 04 '23 at 00:23
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 6305
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
3.78% Terrible
Memory 1.78
1-Core 15.8
2-Core 31.3
8% 16.3 Pts
4-Core 32.3
8-Core 37.3
5% 34.8 Pts
64-Core 12.2
1% 12.2 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 3.78%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Sanyo(144D C195) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 6.9
4% 5.63 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 5.7
4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00B 256GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 187
Write 220
Mixed 216
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 6.2
18% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 100% Great: 196%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.51% Terrible
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 1.9
9% 3.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 0.3
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 250
16% 250 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.51%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 26 4 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0812
Typical 550XDA Builds (Compare 1,454 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop 74%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 550XDA

The Best.
Intel Core i5-13600K $285Nvidia RTX 4060 $285Crucial MX500 250GB $32
Intel Core i5-12400F $149Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4070 $530Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $346SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback