Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 3.78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	4.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 6305 332 User benchmarks, average bench 31% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	3.78% Terrible	Memory 1.78 1-Core 15.8 2-Core 31.3 8% 16.3 Pts	4-Core 32.3 8-Core 37.3 5% 34.8 Pts	64-Core 12.2 1% 12.2 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 3.78% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 39,662 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Sanyo(144D C195) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	4.36% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 6.9 4% 5.63 fps	MRender 6.8 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 5.7 4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.36% Great: 11%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00B 256GB 710 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXM7AK1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 187 Write 220 Mixed 216 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 6.2 18% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 100% Great: 196%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.51% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 1.9 9% 3.13 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 0.3 8% 2.63 GB/s	Latency 250 16% 250 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.51% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	26	4	60	15.5"	1280 720	BOE0812

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	959x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 9%, 39,662 samples	516x
GeForce MX450NvidiaBench 29%, 1,913 samples	13x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-000 256GBSamsungBench 114%, 724 samples	513x
CL1-8D256 256GBSsstcBench 130%, 516 samples	171x
MZVLQ256HBJD-00B 256GBSamsungBench 152%, 710 samples	88x