Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 331%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 571%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics358% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory480.3 GB free of 512 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230210
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 22:40
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Memory 74.3
1-Core 160
2-Core 318
97% 184 Pts
4-Core 629
8-Core 1,266
112% 947 Pts
64-Core 5,673
351% 5,673 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
358% Outstanding
Lighting 553
Reflection 583
Parallax 739
451% 625 fps
MRender 539
Gravity 578
Splatting 293
367% 470 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 358%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2502 2531 2537 2549 2552 2556 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2,197
Write 2,496
Mixed 2,363
SusWrite 2,538
543% 2,399 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 60.4
196% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 910
DQ Mixed 744
577% 779 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 339%
Great: 526%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$371
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 428 428 428 428 428 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 421
Mixed 419
SusWrite 428
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 39.2
128% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 208
156% 209 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$371
2TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 428 428 428 428 428 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 416
Mixed 417
SusWrite 428
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 39.2
127% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 208
156% 209 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 137%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2558 2547 2531 2555 2553 2542 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 2,268
Write 2,573
Mixed 2,376
SusWrite 2,548
552% 2,441 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 62.1
202% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 717
DQ Write 984
DQ Mixed 785
611% 829 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 347%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A8G40AB2-CWE 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
323% Outstanding
MC Read 130
MC Write 122
MC Mixed 148
381% 133 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 57.8
SC Mixed 43
119% 41.6 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 323%
Great: 380%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 144 31.7" 2560 1369 GSM77B7 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 319%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback