Lenovo 82RM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82RM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 22:26
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 72.2
1-Core 164
2-Core 323
98% 186 Pts
4-Core 603
8-Core 1,012
98% 808 Pts
64-Core 1,166
72% 1,166 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 32.8
20% 25.1 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 28.2
Splatting 22.3
18% 21.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 512GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L1QHXC7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,061
Write 1,823
Mixed 1,562
404% 1,816 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 70.2
240% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 949
DQ Write 777
DQ Mixed 880
654% 869 MB/s
Poor: 104% Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN Micron MT40A1G16RC-062E:B 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 22.8
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 26.9
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 1R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 15% 40 216 57 60 13.9" 1536 864 LEN9022
Typical 82RM Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82RM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback