Dynabook dynabook PORTEGE X40-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDynabook dynabook PORTEGE X40-G  (all builds)
MotherboardDynabook A0106/0001
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 21:13
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 158
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 363
41% 322 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(3100 0004) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 7.1
5% 6.37 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.6
7% 7.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-00007 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXH7202Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 985 435 391 392 393 393 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,070
Write 986
Mixed 814
SusWrite 498
189% 842 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 46.3
154% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 518
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 304
243% 349 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 138%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.6% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 17.4
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 13.9" 1920 1009 TOS508F Internal LCD
Typical dynabook PORTEGE X40-G Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dynabook dynabook PORTEGE X40-G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback