MSI B350 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC(MS-7A34)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A34
MotherboardMSI B350 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC(MS-7A34)  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 17:57
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 27.6
2-Core 44.8
34% 47.3 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 170
18% 142 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B8) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.1% Average
Lighting 63.1
Reflection 91.6
Parallax 58.1
51% 70.9 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 62.2
Splatting 26.1
39% 50.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dahua E900 SSD 256GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.11.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 230 172 185 236 255 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 1,306
Write 786
Mixed 560
SusWrite 217
158% 717 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 19.3
102% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 65.6
100% 185 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 106%
Great: 232%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
164GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 16 18 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 98%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 3 1TB
350GB free
Firmware: GKAOAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 62 62 65 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 63.6
Write 62.8
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 63.3
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
39.2% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 15.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 404
10% 404 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 33 11 144 23.8" 1280 720 SGT1234 E238FHD-G
Typical B350 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC(MS-7A34) Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC(MS-7A34)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $409
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback