Advan 1701

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAdvan 1701  (all builds)
MotherboardIP3 ARN39-140H-YD
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230825
Uptime3 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 16:13
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 66.7
1-Core 133
2-Core 242
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 724
71% 580 Pts
64-Core 943
58% 943 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Device(1E50 8018) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.8.2
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 35.6
15% 27.1 fps
MRender 19.4
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 27.7
19% 22.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SCY SMM5T1G51200D 512GB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H221101a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1842 1836 1612 657 626 643 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,560
Write 1,926
Mixed 1,426
SusWrite 1,203
345% 1,529 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 58.8
205% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 399
DQ Write 781
DQ Mixed 630
468% 603 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 226%
Great: 263%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 32.4
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 26.7
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 60 14" 1280 720 INX0000
Typical 1701 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Advan 1701

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback