HP ZBook Studio G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook Studio G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8427
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230626
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 10:25
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 224
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 570
52% 439 Pts
64-Core 718
44% 718 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8427) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.4% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 8.6
5% 8.13 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 13.5
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.4%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GB
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1326 1103 813 816 812 767 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 982
Write 923
Mixed 794
SusWrite 939
205% 909 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 50
158% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 666
DQ Write 367
DQ Mixed 485
369% 506 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 169%
Great: 306%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 32GB
2667, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.9
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 23.5
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 0 0 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE07C2
Typical ZBook Studio G5 Builds (Compare 816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Studio G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback