Lenovo 21D4CTO1WW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemLenovo 21D4CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21D4CTO1WW
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 08:00
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 58.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 243
76% 143 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 849
79% 658 Pts
64-Core 1332
82% 1332 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 22F2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.46.19
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.9% Poor
Lighting 37.7
Reflection 52.4
Parallax 73
31% 54.4 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 37.4
28% 33.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN810 SDCQNRY-1T00-1001 1TB
792GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61540101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,423
Write 2,057
Mixed 1,824
467% 2,101 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 55.1
189% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 554
379% 478 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 556%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F2G32D8DR-031 WT 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 30.3
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 22.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 16" 1280 720 LEN4146
Typical 21D4CTO1WW Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 21D4CTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback