Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 07:29
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$143
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 94.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 241
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 761
73% 603 Pts
64-Core 971
60% 971 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 175
Parallax 21.4
145% 125 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 138
Splatting 119
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 128%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6512G 512GB
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1485 1397 1155 691 1437 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,234
Write 2274
Mixed 1613
SusWrite 1,060
351% 1545 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 64.4
207% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 838
DQ Write 398
DQ Mixed 697
496% 644 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 206%
Great: 270%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
6GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 481
Write 454
Mixed 410
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 54
176% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 350
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$32
75GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 348 353 350 352 351 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 402
Write 353
Mixed 248
SusWrite 349
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 15.4
99% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 85.7
107% 185 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
227GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 164 166 148 167 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 140
Write 103
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 164
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.6% Good
MC Read 34
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 17.7
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 ACR053D Acer KA271
Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback