Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220521
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 06:27
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 69.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 281
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 949
90% 746 Pts
64-Core 1371
85% 1371 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 173
Parallax 182
150% 179 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 133
Splatting 117
115% 145 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$150
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 144 105 130 103 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 486
Mixed 321
SusWrite 140
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 51.3
180% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 345
267% 363 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
367GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 421 430 461 452 360 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 462
Mixed 380
SusWrite 404
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 56.9
191% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 373
281% 376 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 121%
Great: 129%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$80
546GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 421 430 461 452 461 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 470
Mixed 365
SusWrite 421
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 49.8
176% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 368
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 115%
Great: 128%
Corsair MP400 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: ECFM53.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2150 2409 2298 2296 2346 2453 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 1,231
Write 2,225
Mixed 1,304
SusWrite 2,325
403% 1,771 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 55.2
223% 88 MB/s
DQ Read 1,294
DQ Write 1,275
DQ Mixed 1,327
985% 1,299 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 316%
Great: 370%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
520GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 175 67 113 33 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45% Average
Read 390
Write 342
Mixed 276
SusWrite 110
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 14.1
62% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 64
DQ Mixed 22.3
35% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3000C15D4/8GX CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 KHX3000C15D4/8GX CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 25.4
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 25.3
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 0P 1R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27.6" 1920 1080 ACR0804 ED270R
Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $650
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback