HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-xf0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-xf0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8BCA
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 05:07
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 68.8
1-Core 159
2-Core 299
93% 176 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 985
92% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,536
95% 1,536 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
HP(103C 8BCA) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
48.4% Average
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 85.4
45% 55.6 fps
MRender 23.9
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 96.9
56% 63.2 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA512TFH-1BC1AABHA 512GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0043
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,101
Write 2,190
Mixed 1,761
520% 2,351 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 69.7
230% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,162
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 899
625% 803 MB/s
Poor: 135% Great: 403%
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
497GB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 253 64 64 75 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,730
Write 2,214
Mixed 1,702
SusWrite 145
325% 1,448 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 65.3
222% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,117
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 891
613% 780 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 179%
Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G56C46S5.M8G1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
143% Outstanding
MC Read 48.9
MC Write 58.5
MC Mixed 50.3
150% 52.6 GB/s
SC Read 40.8
SC Write 51.8
SC Mixed 40.6
127% 44.4 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 143%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 30 165 16" 1536 793 BOE0B81
Typical OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-xf0xxx Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-xf0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback